In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
- Summarize the key points of both experiential family therapy and narrative family therapy.
- Compare experiential family therapy to narrative family therapy, noting the strengths and weakness of each.
- Provide a description of a family that you think experiential family therapy would be appropriate, explain why, and justify your response using the Learning Resources.
- Note: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references.
Part 2: Family Genogram
Develop a genogram for the client family you selected. The genogram should extend back at least three generations (parents, grandparents, and great grandparents).
Rubric:
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.–
Excellent (90-100) 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Good (80-89) 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Fair (70-79) 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.–
Excellent (90-100) 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good (80-89) 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair (70-79) 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.–
Excellent (90-100) 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Good (80-89) 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Fair (70-79) 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.–
Excellent (90-100) 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Good (80-89) 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Fair (70-79) 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.–
Excellent (90-100) 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Good (80-89) 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Fair (70-79) 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–
Excellent (90-100) 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Good (80-89) 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Fair (70-79) 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 5 (5%)
Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Excellent (90-100) 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Good (80-89) 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Fair (70-79) 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)