Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!


CP – Week 3 Discussion 1st REPLY

CP – Week 3 Discussion 1st REPLY

Reply to the following discussion by supporting the post.  You will want to focus on their point of view, asking pertinent questions, adding to the responses by including information from other sources. Be objective, clear, and concise. 

It is important to support what you say with relevant citations in the APA format from both the course materials and outside resources. 

CB Discussion:

Population:  The group of patients for this proposal will include patients presenting to a nurse practitioner-run specialty clinic in Tulsa, OK for musculoskeletal pain.  Because this clinic does not take insurance and is cash pay only; this group of patients is anticipated to be of higher economic status than average.  Also, this group of patients will most likely demonstrate high self-awareness and high health literacy since they are seeking specialty care outside of normal health care networks.  Patients with musculoskeletal pain benefit from consistent exercise (Lindsay et al., 2020; Mehri et al., 2020). 

Intervention: The intervention of interest is one that would increase patient adherence to a physical conditioning program.  The specific conditioning exercises the patient chooses are not the focus of this proposal.  The more important aspect is what action by the nurse practitioner is most beneficial to improving adherence to an exercise plan.  Health coaching in various patient populations has a positive effect on lifestyle changes such as increasing physical activity.  Health coaching is a patient-centered interaction that facilitates a change in behavior.  The nurse practitioner and the patient set goals and map out an action plan.  As a coach, the nurse practitioner listens, holds space for the patient, facilitates, motivates, provides feedback, and encourages the patient as they make progress along the action plan (Kivelä et al., 2014; Oikarinen et al., 2017).  An initial in-person coaching session and weekly telephone calls with the patient by the nurse practitioner is the intervention.

Comparison: the comparison group will be a similar group of patients from the nurse practitioner specialty practice who do not receive the initial or weekly telephone coaching sessions. 

Outcome:  The outcome of interest is whether or not the patients who participate in health coaching sessions with the nurse practitioner will have better adherence to an exercise plan.

Timeframe:  Lifestyle modifications are not easy endeavors to undertake.  Habits are hard to break.  Therefore, the patients will be evaluated for the outcome at the end of twelve months. 

PICOT Question:  In patients with musculoskeletal pain seeking care from a nurse practitioner specialty clinic (P), does health coaching and weekly telephone coaching calls by the nurse practitioner (I) compared to no coaching (C) increase adherence to a physical exercise plan (O) over the period of one year (T).


Kivelä, K., Elo, S., Kyngäs, H., & Kääriäinen, M. (2014). The effects of health coaching on adult patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling97(2), 147–157.

Lindsay, K., Caplan, N., Weber, T., Salomoni, S., De Martino, E., Winnard, A., Scott, J., Young, E., Hides, J., Hodges, P., & Debuse, D. (2020). Effects of a six-week exercise intervention on function, pain and lumbar multifidus muscle cross-sectional area in chronic low back pain: A proof-of-concept study. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice49, 102190.

Mehri, A., Letafatkar, A., & Khosrokiani, Z. (2020). Effects of corrective exercises on posture, pain, and muscle activation of patients with chronic neck pain exposed to anterior-posterior perturbation. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics43(4), 311–324.

Oikarinen, A., Engblom, J., Kyngäs, H., & Kääriäinen, M. (2017). A study of the relationship between the quality of lifestyle counseling and later adherence to the lifestyle changes based on patients with stroke and tia. Clinical Rehabilitation32(4), 557–567.

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Studymonk only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Studymonk are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Studymonk is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Studymonk, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.