Scholarly Paper Phase 2 

PURPOSE

The purpose of this assignment is to allow the learner to demonstrate good organization, appropriate resources, and correct APA formatting for preparing a scholarly paper. 

**Academic Integrity**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Note: Please use your browser’s File menu to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR351_Scholarly Paper Phase 2 Sept 18NR351_Scholarly Paper Phase 2 Sept 18CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle Page5.0 ptsTitle page adheres very well to APA format (0-1 errors).4.0 ptsTitle page adheres mostly well to APA format (2 errors).3.0 ptsTitle page somewhat adheres to APA format (3 errors).2.0 ptsTitle page does not adhere well to APA format (4 errors).0.0 ptsNo title page OR more than 5 errors.5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMargins, Headings, Headers, Font, Spacing5.0 ptsMargins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere well to APA format.4.0 ptsMargins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere fairly well to APA format.3.0 ptsAdherence of margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing to APA format is only fair.2.0 ptsMargins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere poorly to APA format.0.0 ptsHeadings not used and paper is single spaced with incorrect font and margins.5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction20.0 ptsClearly states the paper topic, explains that paper is summary of the assigned article, and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included.18.0 ptsStates the paper topic, explains that paper is summary of the assigned article, and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included.16.0 ptsVaguely states the paper topic, explains that paper is summary of the assigned article, and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included. OR uses slightly fewer than 50 words or slightly more than 75 words.8.0 ptsDid not sufficiently explain all required items in previous columns of this criterion. OR uses significantly fewer than 50 words or significantly more than 75 words.0.0 ptsDid not provide an introduction.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssigned Article SummaryClearly summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are excellent. Content is attributed to the correct source.Summarizes the paper and makes a concluding statement.65.0 ptsClearly summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are excellent. Content is attributed to the correct source. Excellent revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.57.0 ptsSummarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are good. Content is attributed to the correct source. Good revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.52.0 ptsVaguely summarizes the content of the assigned article. OR uses slightly fewer than 175 words or slightly more than 200 words. OR Content may or may not include main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are fair. OR All content may not be attributed to the correct source. Fair revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.25.0 ptsMay not sufficiently summarize content of the assigned article. OR uses significantly fewer than 175 words or significantly more than 200 words. OR Content may not include main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are poor. OR Content is not be attributed to the correct source. Poor revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.0.0 ptsDid not use the assigned article.65.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact on Your Future PracticeClearly states how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, clearly relates article contents to practice. Uses first person.65.0 ptsClearly states how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, clearly relates article contents to practice. Uses first person. Excellent revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.57.0 ptsStates how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, relates article contents to practice in a mostly clear manner. Uses first person. Good revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.52.0 ptsVaguely states how learning from the article will impact your future practice OR uses slightly fewer than 125 words or slightly more than 150 words OR article contents related to practice in a fair manner. May or may not first person. Fair revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.25.0 ptsMay not sufficiently state how content of the article impacts your future practice OR uses significantly fewer than 125 words or significantly more than 150 words. OR article contents related to practice in a poor manner. Specifics are poor. OR does not use first person. Poor revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.0.0 ptsDid not provide statements required in this section.65.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionClearly writes a concise summary of this paper. Clearly writes strong a concluding statement.25.0 ptsClearly writes a concise summary of this paper. Clearly writes strong a concluding statement. No new information included.Section is 75-100 words.22.0 ptsWrites a concise summary of this paper. Writes a good concluding statement. No new information included. Section is 75-100 words.20.0 ptsWrites a vague summary of this paper. Writes a fair concluding statement. May or may not have included new information.OR uses slightly fewer than 75 words or slightly more than 100 words.10.0 ptsWrites a poor summary of this paper. Writes a poor concluding statement. OR uses significantly fewer than 75 words or significantly more than 100 words.0.0 ptsDid not provide a conclusion section.25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference for Assigned Journal ArticleSee page 198 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers10.0 ptsReference for the assigned article is typed using correct APA format including: author(s), year, article title, journal name, volume number, issue number, page numbers, italics, parentheses, punctuation, double line spacing, and hanging indent. Include DOI if available. Minimal or no errors (0–1 error).9.0 ptsReference for the assigned article is typed using APA format including the items at left with 2–3 errors.8.0 ptsReference for the assigned article is typed using APA format including the items at left with 4-5 errors.4.0 ptsReference typed with 6-8 errors in APA format from the items at left0.0 ptsReference is not for the assigned article OR APA format includes more than 8 errors.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuotation(s) and CitationSee pages 170-171 and 177 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers10.0 ptsTypes 1 or 2 quotations (10–20 words) from assigned article using correct APA citation including quotation marks, authors’ names, year, page numbers, and parentheses with no errors or one minor error. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source.9.0 ptsTypes 1 or 2 quotations (10–20 words) from assigned article using APA citation including items at left with 2–3 minor errors. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source.8.0 ptsQuotation slightly too long or too short. OR Types a quotation (10–20 words) from assigned article using APA citation with 4-5 errors. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source. OR used 3 quotations.4.0 ptsQuotation excessively too long or too short, or quoted selected words or ideas the author(s) of the assigned article cited from another source, or 6-7 errors in APA format. OR used 4 or more quotations.0.0 ptsMore than 7 errors in APA quotation format. OR no quotations provided.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParaphrased Areas and CitationsSee pages 171 and 177 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers10.0 ptsTypes appropriately paraphrased versions of specific ideas from assigned article using correct APA citations including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 0-1 error.9.0 ptsTypes mostly appropriately paraphrased versions of the specific ideas from assigned article using correct APA citations including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 2–3 errors in paraphrasing or citations.8.0 ptsTypes minimally appropriately paraphrased versions of the specific ideas from assigned article using APA citations including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 4-5 errors.4.0 ptsPoorly paraphrased versions and/or APA citations with 6 or more errors OR citations missing for paraphrased ideas.0.0 ptsCopied several sequential words from article without quotation marks and/or citation.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and OrganizationExcellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors10.0 ptsExcellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: – well organized and logical, – correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, – professional wording is used, – uses complete sentences, – paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed9.0 ptsGood mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. A few minor errors noted.8.0 ptsFair mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Some errors noted.4.0 ptsPoor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Many errors noted.0.0 ptsVery poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column such that writing is difficult to follow or understand.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction0.0 pts0 points deductedSubmitted on time0.0 ptsNot Submitted on Time – Points Deducted1 day late= 11.25 deduction; 2 days late= 22.5 deduction; 3 days late= 33.75 deduction; 4 days late= 45 deduction; 5 days late= 56.25 deduction; 6 days late= 67.5 deduction; 7 days late= 78.75 deduction0.0 pts
Total Points: 225.0PreviousNext
 

**Academic Integrity**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Note: Please use your browser’s File menu to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR351_Scholarly Paper Phase 2 Sept 18NR351_Scholarly Paper Phase 2 Sept 18CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle Page5.0 ptsTitle page adheres very well to APA format (0-1 errors).4.0 ptsTitle page adheres mostly well to APA format (2 errors).3.0 ptsTitle page somewhat adheres to APA format (3 errors).2.0 ptsTitle page does not adhere well to APA format (4 errors).0.0 ptsNo title page OR more than 5 errors.5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMargins, Headings, Headers, Font, Spacing5.0 ptsMargins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere well to APA format.4.0 ptsMargins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere fairly well to APA format.3.0 ptsAdherence of margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing to APA format is only fair.2.0 ptsMargins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere poorly to APA format.0.0 ptsHeadings not used and paper is single spaced with incorrect font and margins.5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction20.0 ptsClearly states the paper topic, explains that paper is summary of the assigned article, and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included.18.0 ptsStates the paper topic, explains that paper is summary of the assigned article, and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included.16.0 ptsVaguely states the paper topic, explains that paper is summary of the assigned article, and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included. OR uses slightly fewer than 50 words or slightly more than 75 words.8.0 ptsDid not sufficiently explain all required items in previous columns of this criterion. OR uses significantly fewer than 50 words or significantly more than 75 words.0.0 ptsDid not provide an introduction.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssigned Article SummaryClearly summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are excellent. Content is attributed to the correct source.Summarizes the paper and makes a concluding statement.65.0 ptsClearly summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are excellent. Content is attributed to the correct source. Excellent revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.57.0 ptsSummarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are good. Content is attributed to the correct source. Good revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.52.0 ptsVaguely summarizes the content of the assigned article. OR uses slightly fewer than 175 words or slightly more than 200 words. OR Content may or may not include main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are fair. OR All content may not be attributed to the correct source. Fair revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.25.0 ptsMay not sufficiently summarize content of the assigned article. OR uses significantly fewer than 175 words or significantly more than 200 words. OR Content may not include main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are poor. OR Content is not be attributed to the correct source. Poor revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.0.0 ptsDid not use the assigned article.65.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact on Your Future PracticeClearly states how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, clearly relates article contents to practice. Uses first person.65.0 ptsClearly states how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, clearly relates article contents to practice. Uses first person. Excellent revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.57.0 ptsStates how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, relates article contents to practice in a mostly clear manner. Uses first person. Good revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.52.0 ptsVaguely states how learning from the article will impact your future practice OR uses slightly fewer than 125 words or slightly more than 150 words OR article contents related to practice in a fair manner. May or may not first person. Fair revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.25.0 ptsMay not sufficiently state how content of the article impacts your future practice OR uses significantly fewer than 125 words or significantly more than 150 words. OR article contents related to practice in a poor manner. Specifics are poor. OR does not use first person. Poor revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback.0.0 ptsDid not provide statements required in this section.65.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionClearly writes a concise summary of this paper. Clearly writes strong a concluding statement.25.0 ptsClearly writes a concise summary of this paper. Clearly writes strong a concluding statement. No new information included.Section is 75-100 words.22.0 ptsWrites a concise summary of this paper. Writes a good concluding statement. No new information included. Section is 75-100 words.20.0 ptsWrites a vague summary of this paper. Writes a fair concluding statement. May or may not have included new information.OR uses slightly fewer than 75 words or slightly more than 100 words.10.0 ptsWrites a poor summary of this paper. Writes a poor concluding statement. OR uses significantly fewer than 75 words or significantly more than 100 words.0.0 ptsDid not provide a conclusion section.25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference for Assigned Journal ArticleSee page 198 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers10.0 ptsReference for the assigned article is typed using correct APA format including: author(s), year, article title, journal name, volume number, issue number, page numbers, italics, parentheses, punctuation, double line spacing, and hanging indent. Include DOI if available. Minimal or no errors (0–1 error).9.0 ptsReference for the assigned article is typed using APA format including the items at left with 2–3 errors.8.0 ptsReference for the assigned article is typed using APA format including the items at left with 4-5 errors.4.0 ptsReference typed with 6-8 errors in APA format from the items at left0.0 ptsReference is not for the assigned article OR APA format includes more than 8 errors.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuotation(s) and CitationSee pages 170-171 and 177 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers10.0 ptsTypes 1 or 2 quotations (10–20 words) from assigned article using correct APA citation including quotation marks, authors’ names, year, page numbers, and parentheses with no errors or one minor error. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source.9.0 ptsTypes 1 or 2 quotations (10–20 words) from assigned article using APA citation including items at left with 2–3 minor errors. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source.8.0 ptsQuotation slightly too long or too short. OR Types a quotation (10–20 words) from assigned article using APA citation with 4-5 errors. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source. OR used 3 quotations.4.0 ptsQuotation excessively too long or too short, or quoted selected words or ideas the author(s) of the assigned article cited from another source, or 6-7 errors in APA format. OR used 4 or more quotations.0.0 ptsMore than 7 errors in APA quotation format. OR no quotations provided.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParaphrased Areas and CitationsSee pages 171 and 177 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers10.0 ptsTypes appropriately paraphrased versions of specific ideas from assigned article using correct APA citations including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 0-1 error.9.0 ptsTypes mostly appropriately paraphrased versions of the specific ideas from assigned article using correct APA citations including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 2–3 errors in paraphrasing or citations.8.0 ptsTypes minimally appropriately paraphrased versions of the specific ideas from assigned article using APA citations including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 4-5 errors.4.0 ptsPoorly paraphrased versions and/or APA citations with 6 or more errors OR citations missing for paraphrased ideas.0.0 ptsCopied several sequential words from article without quotation marks and/or citation.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and OrganizationExcellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors10.0 ptsExcellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: – well organized and logical, – correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, – professional wording is used, – uses complete sentences, – paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed9.0 ptsGood mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. A few minor errors noted.8.0 ptsFair mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Some errors noted.4.0 ptsPoor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Many errors noted.0.0 ptsVery poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column such that writing is difficult to follow or understand.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction0.0 pts0 points deductedSubmitted on time0.0 ptsNot Submitted on Time – Points Deducted1 day late= 11.25 deduction; 2 days late= 22.5 deduction; 3 days late= 33.75 deduction; 4 days late= 45 deduction; 5 days late= 56.25 deduction; 6 days late= 67.5 deduction; 7 days late= 78.75 deduction0.0 pts
Total Points: 225.0PreviousNext
 

COURSE OUTCOMES

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes (COs).

• CO3: Demonstrate effective verbal, written, and technological communication using legal and ethical standards for transferring knowledge using success resources provided to Chamberlain students. (PO3)
• CO4: Integrate critical thinking and judgment in professional decision-making in collaboration with faculty and peers. (PO4)
• CO5: Apply concepts of professionalism when planning for personal, intellectual, and professional development. (PO5)
• CO9: Demonstrate accountability for personal and professional development by assessing information and technology competence, implementing plans for upgrading technology skills, and using effective strategies for online student success using resources provided to Chamberlain students. (PO5) 

DUE DATE

Submit the assignment by Sunday end of Week 6, 11:59 p.m. MT.

POINTS

This assignment is worth a total of 225 points.

PREPARING THE SCHOLARLY PAPER PHASE 2

1. Carefully read these instructions and the Rubric.
2. Download the Week 6 Scholarly Paper Phase 2 Template (Links to an external site.). Use of the assigned template is required. Rename that document as Your Last Name Scholarly Paper Phase 2.docx, for example Smith Scholarly Paper Phase 2. Save it to your own computer or drive in a location where you will be able to retrieve it later.
3. Type your assignment directly on the saved template using Microsoft Word. The document must be saved as a .docx. Save frequently to prevent loss of your work.
4. The only resource for your paper is the following assigned article, “Making the case for nursing specialty certification: Promote the profession, advance your career, and improve patient care” (Links to an external site.)
   Note: Logging in to the Chamberlain Library is needed to access this article. Use of the assigned article is required. You must click on the PDF Full Text link on the upper left portion of the page to download the correct version of this required article.
5. Follow the instructions and specifics on the assigned required template and the rubric. You will demonstrate your scholarly writing abilities as well as APA abilities in references, citations, quotations, and paraphrasing.
6. See rubric for length limitations for each section and other criteria.
7. For the Introduction section (see rubric for details),
   1. introduce the assigned paper topic;
   2. explain that the purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of the assigned article;
   3. explain that that the impact of the article contents on your own future practice will be included; and
   4. length must be 50–75 words.
8. For the Article Summary section (see rubric for details),
   1. clearly summarize the major content of the assigned article using 175–200 words;
   2. content must include main ideas from across the entire article;
   3. specifics should be excellent;
   4. content must be attributed to the correct source; and
   5. instructor feedback from Week 4 Scholarly Paper Phase 1 must be used to revise and improve this section.
9. For the Impact section,
   1. clearly state how learning from the assigned article will impact your future practice;
   2. length must be 125–150 words;
   3. writing must be concise and clearly relate the assigned article contents to practice;
   4. use first person in this section; and
   5. instructor feedback from Week 4 Scholarly Paper Phase 1 must be used to revise and improve this section.
10. For the Conclusion,
    
    1. write a concise summary of main points of the paper;
    2. provide a concluding statement; and
    3. length must be 75–100 words.
11. Double check your work with the rubric prior to submission.
12. Note: Assigned Template must be used for this assignment. The Assigned Template has been specially prepared to help you do well on this assignment. See #2 above. 
13. Note: Assigned Article must be used for this assignment. Failure to do so may result in loss of points and/or Academic Integrity violation investigation.